Abstract
This paper will examine Miguel Covarrubias’ arguments to postulate the existence of the “Olmec”, echoin recent researches and taking into account three problems: an iconographic argument about the fetish’s place the middle of the jungle, which in turns refers to ideas about cannibalism; an argument about style that took theoretical and pedagogical resources used at the time in North American Museums, which Covarrubias was familiar with; finally, an argument of Social History, that considers the Olmec as an aristocratic elite that conquered a peasants’ nation. In this author’s opinion, this last argument could be considered as a portrait o Mexican society in twentieth century.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.